TTechUpgradeGuide

Upgrade Your Monitor or Your GPU First?One two-minute test tells you which part is holding the other back. And in October 2026, the monitor is usually the much cheaper fix.

By Ali Shazil·Last updated: October 2026
A graphics card lying on a desk in front of a gaming monitor, showing the choice between the two upgrades

Upgrade your monitor first if your graphics card already makes more frames than your screen can show: an RTX 3060 Ti or faster on a 60Hz screen is the classic case. Upgrade your graphics card first if your games already run well below your screen's refresh rate, because a new monitor can't add frames, and a sharper 1440p one takes about 30% of them away.

Right now the monitor is also the much cheaper fix. As of October 28, 2026, a 1440p 180Hz monitor starts at $129.77, while the cheapest new RTX 5060 costs $449.99. Here's the two-minute test that tells you which group you're in.

1. The Direct Answer: Monitor or GPU First?

Your fps is above your refresh rate → upgrade the monitor. Your card is already making frames the screen throws away.

Your fps is well below your refresh rate → upgrade the graphics card. The screen is waiting on the card, not the other way round.

Low fps but your graphics card isn't busy → it's your CPU. Neither upgrade fixes it.

The two parts are linked like this: the monitor sets the target (how many pixels and how many frames per second it can show), and the graphics card has to hit that target.

Prices point the same way in 2026. Every monitor tier in Section 6 costs 43% to 54% less than TechSpot's June 2024 starting prices, while every current graphics card we list sells 27% to 80% above its launch price. Neither upgrade is better in general. What decides it is whether your graphics card already makes more frames than your screen can show.

2. The Two-Minute Test: Your FPS vs Your Refresh Rate

Refresh rate (Hz) is how many times per second the screen updates. Frame rate (fps) is how many frames your PC sends. Per RTINGS, ideally the two match, and a higher refresh rate only feels smoother if the graphics card makes enough frames to use it. Four steps show where you stand:

  1. Find your refresh rate. Open Windows Settings → System → Display → Advanced display and look at "Choose a refresh rate". Write down the number (60Hz, 144Hz, 165Hz…). If your monitor can do more than the selected rate, change it now. That's a free upgrade.
  2. Find your real fps. Turn on an fps counter: the game's own counter, the Steam overlay, the NVIDIA app or AMD Adrenalin overlay, or MSI Afterburner (our low-fps guide covers the Afterburner setup). Play your main game for 10 minutes with V-Sync and any frame cap off, and note the typical fps.
  3. Check GPU usage in the same overlay. Usage near 95–100% means the graphics card is the part working hardest.
  4. Compare. Match your numbers to the box below.

Here is what that looks like with real cards. Tom's Hardware's GPU hierarchy (updated June 24, 2026) averages 111.5 fps for an RTX 4070 at 1080p. Those are high-to-ultra averages from a Ryzen 7 9800X3D, so medium settings give more and a slower CPU can give less. On a 60Hz screen, 46% of that card's frames are never shown. An RTX 3070 averages 87.2 fps and loses 31%, and an RTX 3060 Ti at 74.2 fps loses 19%. An RX 6600 averages 51.9 fps at 1080p Ultra, so it can't even fill a 60Hz screen at those settings. That's a graphics-card-first case.

Your fps vs your refresh rate: what to upgrade

Measure in the game you play most, with V-Sync and frame caps off.

3. Signs Your Monitor Is the Bottleneck (Upgrade It First)

An old thick-bezel monitor beside a new thin-bezel gaming monitor on the same desk

You're in the monitor-first group if most of these fit:

  • —Your fps sits above your refresh rate in the games you play most.
  • —You're on a 60Hz or 75Hz screen with an RTX 3060 Ti, RTX 4060, RX 7600 or anything faster.
  • —You play competitive games, where a 144–240Hz screen pays off even on a mid-range card.
  • —Your monitor has no variable refresh rate, so you get tearing or have to use V-Sync.
  • —Your monitor is an old TN panel, or it looks washed out.
  • —Your graphics card barely breaks a sweat (low usage) in esports titles at high fps.

The 60Hz case is the clearest. Plenty of people still game on 60Hz screens, and a 60Hz screen shows a new image every 16.7 ms. A 144Hz screen shows one every 6.9 ms, 180Hz every 5.6 ms and 240Hz every 4.2 ms, which is why higher refresh rates feel more responsive as well as smoother. In its 2024 article "Upgrade Your Monitor, Not Your GPU", TechSpot called going from 60Hz to 144Hz a huge upgrade and said anyone on 60Hz should make a 144Hz monitor their top priority. My call: if you're on 60Hz with a card from the last five years, I'd buy the monitor before thinking about anything else.

Competitive games matter here because the Tom's Hardware numbers come from demanding titles at high and ultra settings. Lighter esports games run much faster on the same card, so a 144–240Hz screen has frames to use even when your card looks modest on paper.

Variable refresh rate (VRR, sold as FreeSync or G-Sync Compatible) keeps the screen in step with the game and reduces tearing when fps drops. TechSpot notes that all high-refresh monitors today support it, so a modern monitor fixes the V-Sync problem too.

Some monitor upgrades cost zero fps. TechSpot lists faster pixel response (less blur), better colour and viewing angles (IPS over an old TN panel), HDR and OLED contrast. OLED also gives about 1.5× the motion clarity of an LCD at the same refresh rate: TechSpot's example is that a 100Hz OLED looks about as clear in motion as a 150Hz fast LCD.

4. Signs Your Graphics Card Is the Bottleneck (Upgrade It First)

The graphics card comes first when the frames aren't there to begin with:

  • —Your fps is already well below your refresh rate (45 fps on a 144Hz screen, for example) and GPU usage is near 100%.
  • —You already own a decent high-refresh monitor (144Hz or more with VRR), so the screen isn't the limit.
  • —Your card struggles at 1080p in the games you play.
  • —You're running out of video memory: stutter, blurry or late-loading textures.

Tom's Hardware's 1080p Ultra averages show what "struggles" looks like: 51.9 fps for an RX 6600 and 61.5 fps for an RTX 3060 12GB. Cards that low can't feed a 144Hz screen, and a bigger monitor would only make that worse. If video memory is the problem, our 12GB VRAM guide and RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs 8GB comparison explain how much you need.

Low fps and low GPU usage means the CPU is the limit. If your graphics card is well under about 90% busy and fps is still low, neither a monitor nor a new GPU fixes it. Work out which part is holding you back with What Should I Upgrade on My PC?

If the graphics card is the answer, start with the best GPUs for 1440p, run through the pre-purchase checks and, given today's prices, read used vs new in 2026.

5. What a Higher Resolution Does to Your FPS

How fps drops as resolution goes up

Average fps across 11 games at high/ultra settings, Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Source: Tom's Hardware GPU Benchmarks Hierarchy, updated June 24, 2026.

A 1440p screen has 3,686,400 pixels, which is 78% more than the 2,073,600 in 1080p. A 4K screen has 8,294,400, four times as many. The chart shows how much fps drops when resolution goes up, measured at high and ultra settings on a fast CPU. It isn't the fps you will get: medium settings or upscaling give more.

Most mid-range and budget cards in Tom's data lose about 30–33% going from 1080p to 1440p. The RTX 3070 falls from 87.2 to 58.2 fps, the RTX 4060 from 71.5 to 47.6 and the RX 9070 from 140.9 to 104.0. The RTX 5090 loses only 18%, but only because at 1080p even the fastest CPU holds it back.

4K is harsher. Only the fastest cards stay near 60 fps at ultra: the RX 9070 XT averages 65.8 and the RTX 5070 54.3. The 8GB cards fall hard, with an RTX 5060 at 21.8 fps and an RTX 4060 at 17.4.

Upscaling softens this. In TechSpot's May 2026 piece on 1440p CPU testing, 1440p with DLSS or FSR on Quality renders at 960p, which is fewer pixels than native 1080p, and 64% of the readers it polled use upscaling at 1440p. So a card that handles 1080p well can usually drive a 1440p screen with upscaling on. 4K with Performance mode renders at 1080p and is now widely considered acceptable. This is also why 1440p is no longer a stretch: the Steam Hardware Survey for September 2026 has 27.04% of players on a 2560×1440 primary display, against 47.91% on 1920×1080 and 4.79% on 3840×2160.

You also don't have to max out a new monitor on day one. TechSpot's 2024 advice still holds: raise resolution now and frame rate later, or the other way round. Play at the sharper resolution with upscaling or lower settings today, and add a faster graphics card when the budget allows.

My rule of thumb, based on the table above: an RTX 4060 or RX 7600 suits 1080p high-refresh, or 1440p with upscaling. An RTX 4070, RTX 5060 Ti 16GB or RX 9060 XT 16GB suits 1440p at 144–180Hz. An RX 9070, RTX 5070 or faster suits 1440p at 240Hz, or 4K with upscaling.

6. What Each Upgrade Costs Right Now (October 2026)

What each upgrade costs today

Lowest in-stock US prices, October 28, 2026. Source: PCPartPicker.

As of October 28, 2026, the cheapest 1440p 180Hz monitor on PCPartPicker is $129.77. That's 28.8% of the $449.99 you would pay for the cheapest new RTX 5060, so less than a third. A 1440p 240Hz IPS monitor at $179.99 is 40% of it. A 1440p 240Hz OLED at $319.00 is $130.99 less than that RTX 5060 and $380.99 less than an RX 9070 at $699.99.

Monitor tierLowest in stockName-brand examples
1080p 144–180Hz IPS$84.99 (MSI G242L E14, 23.8", 144Hz)Philips 24E2G2200 180Hz $93.06
1440p 144–200Hz IPS, 27"$129.77 (ASRock PG27QFT1B, 180Hz)MSI MAG 275QF E20 200Hz $159.99; LG 27GS75Q-B 180Hz $169.99
1440p 240Hz+ IPS, 27"$179.99 (Acer VG272U W2, 240Hz)MSI MAG 274QF X24 $219.99; Alienware AW2726DL 280Hz $229.99
1440p 240Hz OLED, 27"$319.00 (ASRock PGO27QSA-W, QD-OLED)MSI MAG 274QP QD-OLED X24 $319.99; LG 27GS93QE-B $499.99
4K 144–160Hz IPS, 27"$254.98 (KTC H27P22S, 160Hz)MSI MAG 272URDF E16 $299.99; Acer Nitro XV273K 144Hz $319.99

Monitors got much cheaper since 2024

Every monitor tier costs about 40–55% less than in mid-2024; a 1440p 240Hz OLED went from about $700 to $319.
TierJune 2024 (TechSpot, starting from)October 2026 (lowest in stock)
High-refresh entryunder $150$84.99
1440p 144Hz+under $250$129.77
1440p 240Hzfrom $350$179.99
1440p 240Hz OLEDaround $700$319.00
4K high refreshfrom $450$254.98
June 2024: TechSpot's starting prices. October 28, 2026: lowest in-stock US prices on PCPartPicker. The 2024 column is "starting from" figures, not exactly matching products.

Every tier is 43% to 54% cheaper than TechSpot's June 2024 starting prices (−43%, −48%, −49%, −54% and −43%, in table order). The 1440p 240Hz OLED went from about $700 to $319.

CardLowest in stockModelLaunch MSRPOver MSRP
RTX 5060 8GB$449.99PNY OC$299.99+50%
RX 9060 XT 8GB$459.99Gigabyte Gaming OC$299.99+53%
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB$529.99Zotac Twin Edge OC$379.99+39%
RX 9060 XT 16GB$629.00Yeston Sakura$349.99+80%
RX 9070 16GB$699.99ASRock Challenger$549.99+27%
RTX 5060 Ti 16GB$765.99Asus DUAL OC$429.99+78%
RTX 5070 12GB$869.99Asus PRIME$549.99+58%

Graphics cards went the other way. Every card in the table sells 27% to 80% above its launch price (as of October 28, 2026, from PCPartPicker, with launch prices from Tom's Hardware's GPU hierarchy): an RTX 5060 costs $449.99 against $299.99 at launch, and an RTX 5070 costs $869.99 against $549.99. The memory shortage is pushing graphics card prices up (our GPU prices and RAM shortage guide explains how), and monitors don't use that memory.

Prices move fast, and this section is updated during the site's regular price checks. If you're deciding between the two upgrades with the money limited, the gap above is the strongest argument for the monitor, as long as the test in Section 2 says your card has frames to spare.

7. Common Mistakes (and the Verdict)

Mistake 1: Buying a 4K monitor for a mid-range card

Fps drops by more than half at 4K on most mid-range cards. In Tom's Hardware's tests an RTX 4070 goes from 111.5 fps at 1080p to 41.3 at 4K. Unless you plan to lean on upscaling, 1440p is the safer step up.

Mistake 2: Buying a new GPU while still on a 60Hz screen

You pay for frames you never see. A 60Hz screen can only show 60 of them per second, however many the card makes.

Mistake 3: Never changing the refresh rate after plugging in

New monitors often come out of the box set to 60Hz, or are connected with a cable or port that can't carry the full refresh rate. Check Windows display settings (Section 2, step 1) before you decide the monitor disappointed you. It costs nothing.

Mistake 4: Blaming the monitor or GPU when the CPU is the limit

If fps is low and GPU usage is low, a different part is holding the system back. Run the test in Section 2 before you spend anything.

Mistake 5: Assuming a better monitor needs a GPU upgrade

HDR, OLED contrast, better colour and sharper text cost zero fps, so a monitor can look much better without asking more of your card.

The verdict

Upgrade your monitor first if your graphics card already makes more frames than your screen can show. That covers most people with an RTX 3060 Ti, RTX 4060 or faster who are still on a 60Hz screen. In October 2026 it's also the far cheaper upgrade: a 1440p 180Hz monitor starts at $129.77, less than a third of the cheapest new RTX 5060 ($449.99). Upgrade your graphics card first if your games already run well below your refresh rate, because a new monitor can't add frames, and a 1440p one takes about 30% of them away.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I upgrade my monitor or GPU first?

Compare your fps with your monitor's refresh rate. If your graphics card already makes more frames than your screen can show, upgrade the monitor first. If your games run well below your refresh rate and your graphics card is working at close to 100%, upgrade the graphics card first. If fps is low but the graphics card isn't busy, your CPU is the limit, and neither upgrade fixes it.

Is a 144Hz monitor worth it without a powerful GPU?

Yes, if your card can go past 60 fps in the games you play. In Tom's Hardware's tests, even an RTX 4060 averages 71.5 fps at 1080p on high-to-ultra settings, and lighter competitive games run much faster. A 144Hz screen with variable refresh rate also stays smooth when fps falls below 144, so you don't have to hit the maximum to feel the difference.

Will a 1440p monitor lower my FPS?

Yes, if you play at native 1440p. It has 78% more pixels than 1080p, and in Tom's Hardware's tests most mid-range cards lose about 30–33% of their fps going from 1080p to 1440p. Upscaling such as DLSS or FSR on Quality mode renders at 960p internally, which gets most of that speed back while keeping the sharper screen.

Can my graphics card run a 4K monitor?

Only the faster cards can at high settings. In Tom's Hardware's tests, the RX 9070 XT averaged 65.8 fps at 4K and the RTX 5070 54.3 fps, while an RTX 4060 managed 17.4 fps. For mid-range cards, 4K is only realistic with upscaling on Performance mode, which renders at 1080p internally, or with lower settings.

Is an OLED monitor a better upgrade than a new GPU?

Often, if your graphics card already gives you good frame rates. As of October 28, 2026, a 1440p 240Hz OLED starts at $319, which is $380.99 less than an RX 9070. OLED improves contrast, colour and motion clarity in every game without costing any fps. If your fps is already too low, though, an OLED won't fix that. Upgrade the GPU first.

Do I need a new graphics card if I buy a new monitor?

Not necessarily. A new monitor at the same resolution, such as going from 1080p 60Hz to 1080p 180Hz, needs no extra power to look and feel better. Moving to 1440p or 4K does ask more of your card, but you can use upscaling or lower settings at first and upgrade the graphics card later.

What to Read Next

Get notified before prices spike

PC upgrade guides and price alerts for GPUs, RAM, and storage — straight to your inbox.